Re: inefficient handling of bug reports?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:32 PM, solsTiCe d'Hiver
<solstice.dhiver@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Le lundi 28 mars 2011 à 22:19 +0900, Angus a écrit :
>> I use that when reporting bugs, but it doesn't seem to get my reports
>> assigned to the relevant maintainer(s) any faster at all...
>
> You just forgot one thing:
> Assigning automatically a bug to a maintainer does not mean the bug will
> be fixed any faster.
>
> I can see now some of my bugs, assigned and fixed asap, while others are
> assigned and linger on for quite some time. Because the maintainer does
> not take any action. It entirely depends on the maintainer willingness.
> This is especially true for [community]
>
> I don't want to point the finger at some maintainer here. I am trying to
> make a point.
>
Separate and tangential topic. Automatic assignment, if it works, will
save time (and more importantly won't lose time).


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux