Re: [arch-general] inefficient handling of bug reports?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:18:14 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:

There is no problem. What are you talking about? Anyone is free to
mention in the report what package they think is related.

Which eludes to the original issue - instead of a wrangler, or team of wranglers, who have to deal with everything, let users do the initial assignment, then if it needs to go somewhere else, the team it's been assigned to can throw it back to the "wranglers".

I digress, I think...

What information? You have a tracker, you know it's Flyspray, if you
can file a feature request with at least a demonstrated logic if not a PHP patch. If it's easy to implement, we might do it. Else, you can go
upstream.

Now, let's not get into why we use Flyspray in the first place. You
can ask the rest of the OSS world why they use what they use.

I understand, but look, this is the first time I've ever commented on this list.

Even though the button name makes no sense, I'll go back to lurking.

--
Simon Perry (aka Pezz)
[ s a n x i o n . n e t ]


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux