Re: What happened to Powerpill?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



I guess it would make sense if your own bandwidth is bigger then the
mirror's...

2011/3/28 Cédric Girard <girard.cedric@xxxxxxxxx>

> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > If you have 10 files to download, powerpill allows for 1 file from
> > mirror A, another from mirror B, and chunks of that large 68MB file
> > from mirrors C, D, and E at the same time.
> >
> > With the other solutions, you'd still wait for file 1 to finish
> > downloading before downloading file 2.
> >
>
> I understand this as being more flexible. But bandwith-wise, I do not see
> why the Powerpill solution is more efficient.
> Or maybe this come useful only when downloading small files where file
> content transfert itself is negligible compared to connection opening and
> other protocol handling...
>
> --
> Cédric Girard
>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux