On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Milos Negovanovic < milos.negovanovic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Cédric Girard wrote: > > No. But what I understood from what Thomas said is: as you need to reboot > > your server anyway from time to time to apply security updates, you may > > decide to switch to an even more often updated kernel, if your > architecture > > permit it (reboot != service interruption). > > For most people running arch on their servers reboot == service > interruption > > Am I wrong here? > > As I stated in my previous mail, you may have a resilient architecture with a failover for your services. Howerver I can easily understand how this may sound unrealistic in a home server context. -- Cédric Girard
