Re: [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:40:58 +0100
Thomas Bächler <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> We used to have lots of patches in the kernel (between 5 and 15), so a
> single -ARCH patch was created.
> Now, the number of patches is fairly small and I am thinking maybe we
> should go back to single patches.
> 
> Optimally, we could even have a git tree that tracks "our" kernel - at
> the time my git skills were not advanced enough to do this, but now I
> know how to do it.
> 
> I'm unsure which way is the most transparent.

a git tree to track our kernel seems better. that way users have much more flexibility in viewing diffs and so on.

Dieter


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux