Solution for bug 22690 ?!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Solution for bug 22690 ?!
From: Frederic Bezies <fredbezies@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 12:07:35 +0100
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0b13pre) Gecko/20110319 Thunderbird/3.3a4pre

Hello.

I looked at 2.6.37-1 config changelog comparing it with 2.6.36-2 (or 3)one, and find this option was added.


CONFIG_USB_ENESTORAGE=m

I'm trying to build a kernel without it. Could be the answer for myproblem ?!


--
Frederic Bezies - fredbezies@xxxxxxxxx
Weblog : http://frederic.bezies.free.fr/blog/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Solution for bug 22690 ?!
  - From: Jan Steffens

Prev by Date: Re: [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-1
Next by Date: Re: Solution for bug 22690 ?!
Previous by thread: Introducing Salt
Next by thread: Re: Solution for bug 22690 ?!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux