Re: ArchBang and other derivates resemblance to Arch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



We've had a few occurrences on the Arch forums where it became clear that
ArchBang actually ships some changed configs, so this could become quite
confusing i guess.


2011/2/7 Thomas Bächler <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Am 07.02.2011 10:26, schrieb Olivier Keun | CAPSTONE:
> > Maybe it would be better if a more fundamental line is drawn between the
> > two, such as the website design like Ionuț mentions. And a clear
> statement
> > on the ArchBang website that it is _not_ an official Arch project.
>
> Maybe it would be a good first step to be clear about what ArchBang
> really is - and as far as I can see, it is simply a customized
> installer, nothing more.
>
> I like that their website resembles ours though.
>
>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux