On 2 February 2011 01:10, David C. Rankin <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 02/01/2011 10:41 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: >> (3) Lastly, if anybody has interest, please look over the PKGBUILDs and let me >> know where I'm doing something stupid. I have done quite a bit of reading trying >> to digest PKGBUILDs and how to apply them to a large project like Trinity. I >> don't claim to be an expert on them, so I know there are places where they need >> improving. Thanks. > > Just a note. In addition to the tqtinterface and trinity-arts, trinity-kdelibs > PKGBUILD is now working and open for comment: > > http://www.3111skyline.com/dl/dt/trinity/arch/dev/kdelibs/PKGBUILD > > so far so good -- a little PKGBUILD knowledge... is a dangerous thing :P > > -- > David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. > I don't see why you need meta packages; groups should do fine. I think the only reason that Arch's meta packages exist is to provide an upgrade path from the pre-splitpkg KDE days. -- Tavian Barnes
