On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 19:00 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 18:45 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote: > > On 31 January 2011 17:45, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I can't imagine a user waiting for a updated package of foo when there > > > is a new version out and he wants to rebuild. (He just does that > > > himself) > > > > > > To rest my case, i think the current situation is good enough. > > > > He already mentioned that he can "manually access the SVN interface". > > He needs the ABS way because he's using bauerbill to patch up stuff. > > > > So you should bug the bauerbill author to include some kind of > > alternative, say, SVN/GIT support. > > Thanks Ray, that's precisely the situation. > > And I did bug the author prior to posting her, who replied that he > wouldn't =). Fair enough, its kinda a niche requirement in any case. > Ah, i misunderstood, sorry ;) -- Jelle van der Waa
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
