On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 1:00 AM, David C. Rankin <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/29/2011 12:09 AM, Thomas S Hatch wrote: >> 2011/1/28 David C. Rankin <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >>> On 01/28/2011 11:30 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: >>>>>>>>>> So what say the powers that be? Do the wiki page here or >>> at >>>>>>>> Trinity? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The wiki is for Arch-related documentation, so why not? >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes! wiki it up! >>>> kde3 is only dead as long as noone maintains it. That's how Arch works, >>>> after all. So yes, I think putting Trinity on the wiki is fine, and it >>>> should/will only get nixed if it stops getting maintained. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Thanks Peter, Ray, Thomas and Ng, >>> >>> I'll get the framework done this weekend. It is a double bonus doing >>> it here, >>> Trinity uses FosWiki and it is miserable compared to mediawiki :) >>> >>> -- >>> David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. >>> >> >> Thanks David, I am excited to see it! >> >> -Thomas S Hatch >> > > Guys, > > I have gotten the outline for the Trinity page completed and have made good > headway getting the contents up. I still have information to add, but my fingers > wore out. I get the remaining info up in the next day or so. The page is: > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Trinity > > I still need to know what to do with the PKGBUILDs I have so far. I don't know > if I should upload them as part of the wiki, or just provide links to them on > another site. I'll create the links once I know where you guys want me to put > them. I can just leave them on my server (it's no size or bandwidth issue) > > If you have thoughts or ideas for solving some of the problems mentioned in > the wiki, let me know. I'm shallow on experience with PKGBUILDs, but learning > fast. That's it for now. > > The best place for any PKGBUILD is really in the AUR and maybe under a seperate source control, but that's not really required.
