Re: Question about automated builder

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Isaac Dupree <
ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 01/28/11 09:32, Jakob Gruber wrote:
>
>> Another aspect of this is security. Right now, any dev / TU could
>> theoretically check in a correct PKGBUILD but upload a binary package
>> with *insert malicious content* in it to the repos with a very low
>> probability of anyone ever noticing. A (mandatory) central build server
>> could guarantee that the package is actually built with the specified
>> publically available PKGBUILD.
>>
>> I'm not a security expert so please call me out if I'm talking nonsense.
>>
>
> You have to trust all servers that are used for building. (and the servers
> need to collectively have enough processing power to build everything!)  If
> we take random volunteers then it's not secure.  But it can certainly help
> security in certain ways if done right.
>
> ~Isaac
>

Yes, we cannot take "random" volunteers, but I am confident that we will be
able to find distributed resources that are secure


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux