On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase <sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > "Ionuț Bîru" <ibiru@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>On 01/27/2011 12:41 PM, Auguste Pop wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am not aware of the package until I saw it listed on the home page >>> of Archlinux today. Just out of curiosity, I skimmed the contents of >>> the package and find out that they are mainly html files. Shouldn't >>it >>> be "any" rather than i686/x86_64? Should I file a bug report or this >>> is just my ignorance of imagemagick? >>> >>> Thank you for your kind attention. >>> >>> Yours, >> >>is not a bug. is more a impossibility to split 'any' packages like >>that. >>makepkg supports such splits but our server scripts doesn't handle them >> >>at all. >> >> >>-- >>Ionuț > > Indeed, but can still create a separate 'any' package like we do with some games. Just a split package won't work there. > FTR, there used to be a seperate 'any' imagemagick-doc packge but I just removed it because it was too much work and it was often forgotten when other devs were rebuilding or updating imagemagick. Plus, it's only 3MB.
