On Thursday 27 January 2011 18:41:58 Auguste Pop wrote: > I am not aware of the package until I saw it listed on the home page > of Archlinux today. Just out of curiosity, I skimmed the contents of > the package and find out that they are mainly html files. Shouldn't it > be "any" rather than i686/x86_64? Should I file a bug report or this > is just my ignorance of imagemagick? Cannot be 'any' because it has been merged in imagemagick PKGBUILD and makepkg yet does not support different architectures for splitted packages. (Or maybe the support is missing in db-scripts). -- Andrea
