Re: GPG signature (was: GPT slower than MBR, although both are properly aligned?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: GPG signature (was: GPT slower than MBR, although both are properly aligned?)
From: Frank Thieme <frank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 09:03:15 +0100
In-reply-to: <4D3B72F5.40604@babioch.de>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.36-CHAKRA; KDE/4.5.5; x86_64; ; )

Hi!

Maybe it's just me, but all your messages in this thread have a bad 
signature...

Bye...Frank

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GPG signature (was: GPT slower than MBR, although both are properly aligned?)
  - From: Guillaume ALAUX

References:
- GPT slower than MBR, although both are properly aligned?
  - From: Karol Babioch
- Re: GPT slower than MBR, although both are properly aligned?
  - From: Mauro Santos
- Re: GPT slower than MBR, although both are properly aligned?
  - From: Karol Babioch

Prev by Date: Re: Gnome Sound Events and Settings
Next by Date: Re: GPG signature (was: GPT slower than MBR, although both are properly aligned?)
Previous by thread: Re: GPT slower than MBR, although both are properly aligned?
Next by thread: Re: GPG signature (was: GPT slower than MBR, although both are properly aligned?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux