Why does v4l-utils package exists both in [extra] and [multilib]?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Why does v4l-utils package exists both in [extra] and [multilib]?
From: Kirill Churin <reflexing@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:24:34 +0500
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Why does v4l-utils package exists both in [extra] and [multilib]?

Found it while updating Skype wiki page.

-- 
Kirill Churin
Jabber: reflexing@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ICQ: 8163230, Skype on demand.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why does v4l-utils package exists both in [extra] and [multilib]?
  - From: Lukas Fleischer

Prev by Date: Re: Package coordination with archlinuxfr repo?
Next by Date: Re: Why does v4l-utils package exists both in [extra] and [multilib]?
Previous by thread: Package coordination with archlinuxfr repo?
Next by thread: Re: Why does v4l-utils package exists both in [extra] and [multilib]?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux