Re: kernel 2.6.37 BKL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



It seems like there is already agreement to keep BKL enabled, but for
what it's worth here are my two cents:

As explained by Andi Kleen <http://halobates.de/blog/p/56>, the
disabling of BKL has no impact on end users. The benefit might come
later, as the absence of BKL allows optimizations to be made. However,
for the time being there is no benefit in removing it, and as Thomas
pointed out, some functionality would be lost (Matthew: the v4l
subsystem was fixed to work without BKL, that's why it still works for
you :) ).

Cheers,

Tom


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux