Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Correct me if I'm wrong but it looks like > extra/progsreiserfs >> (0.3.0.5-5) is an old duplicate of core/reiserfsprogs > (3.6.21-3). >> >> I search for reasons in mailing list archives for having > both but found >> none. >> >> Nb: Old extra/progsreiserfs PKGBUILD [1] pulls a tarball > from >> ftp.archlinux.org. Let's remember to remove the tarball if > we get rid of >> the package. >> >> [1] >> > http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/progsreiserfs/trunk/PKGBUILD > > See my comments on https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9029 > Tpowa must know something we dont and must be using it. > Most likely cause of the reasons mentioned here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143485 Testdisk uses libreiserfs. Maybe there should be a big fat warning for standalone usage though. -- Greg
