Am 06.12.2010 11:39, schrieb Tom Gundersen: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Allan McRae <allan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> While looking through bugs for [core] packages, I notice that there are a >> large number of bug report for these three packages. In total they account >> for ~13% of the bugs in the tracker! > > [...] > >> But given these are some of the uniqueness of Arch, I wonder what we _as a >> group_ could to do to improve this situation? Perhaps organize a >> hack-a-thon on IRC one day? Or we could advertise for help, with the >> selection criterion being a git repo provided by the applicant showing they >> can do stuff? > > As discussed with Allan, here are some patches to initscripts: > <https://github.com/teg/initscripts-arch>. > > Comments very much welcome. > > I started off with what appeared to me as the low-hanging fruit. Once > I have had feedback on this I'll have a look at more difficult (or > invasive) problems. > > My long-term goal is to ease the maintenance burden of initscripts by > simplifying them and harmonizing them with other distros/projects > (without, of course, loosing any of their features). https://github.com/teg/initscripts-arch/commit/b4c804d60d6e8361db3f19bf3a2fa6fb58ee8458 Two short comments about this commit: 1) We need to run vgchange again after rw-mounting everything (without --sysinit), so monitoring can be set up. 2) mkinitcpio's LVM hook also needs --sysinit. The rest of the patches are fine.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
