On Nov 26, 2010, at 10:57 PM, Allan McRae <allan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 27/11/10 14:51, C Anthony Risinger wrote: >> Good to see the overwhelming positive lean; is pulse being considered >> for an eventual default by chance? > > Almost nothing is default on Arch... Beh you know what I mean :-) i.e. "recommeded", only-one-or-the-other packages become PKG/PKG-alsa instead of PKG/PKG-pulse, package groups use pulse builds, etc etc... or am I off base? C Anthony [mobile]
