Re: [arch-dev-public] Boot loaders in core/base

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 20-11-2010 15:15, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:38:33 +0100
> schrieb Thomas Bächler <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
>> I don't think it's a good idea to maintain that many bootloaders in
>> core. grub-legacy is unmaintained, lilo has a very old-school design
>> and major disadvantages. We could keep grub2, but it seems it isn't
>> really stable yet.
> 
> That's what I mean. There's unfortunately not an allrounder, yet. One
> old and unmaintained, one still older bootloader, one newer and
> maintained but still unstable and one newer and maintained with not so
> many supported filesystems.

It just needs to know how to read well from /boot which can be quite
small (100~200MB) and be whatever filesystem will be supported for years
to come, even if the supported filesystems change it's not much of a
trouble copying stuff somewhere else, formatting and copying back.
Sometimes more is not better if support is flaky.


-- 
Mauro Santos


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux