Re: perl 5.12.1-3? not 5.12.2-1?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: perl 5.12.1-3? not 5.12.2-1?
From: Ionuț Bîru <ibiru@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 15:14:28 +0200
In-reply-to: <AANLkTi=nczsdoNJbSdgtCVZeAxD+U1CKpZSwOmv_2FFs@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101028 Lanikai/3.1.6

On 11/02/2010 03:05 PM, Caleb Cushing wrote:

I'm just a bit curious on this, why release a -3 when upstream
released a new ABI compatible (as far as I know) release over a month
ago, that isn't yet in repo.


lets see. http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/perl/trunk/

upgpkg: perl 5.12.1-3
db-5.1 rebuild

--
Ionuț

Follow-Ups:
- Re: perl 5.12.1-3? not 5.12.2-1?
  - From: Caleb Cushing

References:
- perl 5.12.1-3? not 5.12.2-1?
  - From: Caleb Cushing

Prev by Date: perl 5.12.1-3? not 5.12.2-1?
Next by Date: Re: perl 5.12.1-3? not 5.12.2-1?
Previous by thread: perl 5.12.1-3? not 5.12.2-1?
Next by thread: Re: perl 5.12.1-3? not 5.12.2-1?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux