On 27/10/10 13:25, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Thomas Bächler<thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am 26.10.2010 03:38, schrieb Allan McRae:
Another day, another glibc...
This adjusts the static linking fix. The one previously used is a more
correct fix but appears incomplete. I have replaced this by a hack fix
that Fedora uses.
I will leave this in [testing] a while. My concern is the previous
patch apparently fixed a bunch of segfault bugs in glibc and I am hoping
that these do not get reintroduced.
If only upstream made a proper fix for this. Saying upstream is doing
not much about this bug would imply that they are doing something...
Thomas not know bug. Computer still boot. Thomas happy. Hurray! Thomas
sign off.
Segfault detected. Happens with bauerbill's AUR component. I'll just
pastebin the backtrace.
--> Searching for upgradable AUR packages...
*** glibc detected *** /usr/bin/perl: double free or corruption
(fasttop): 0x00007fcbc826cf60 ***
======= Backtrace: =========
http://pastebin.com/mgkBjv5q
Is this new and does downgrading glibc to the version in [core] fix it?
