I noticed this by compiling the package myself... When I sent this mail, the web page was not updated and I saw an old list of files that did not contain the .so file. I should have tried it first rather than relying on a presumably delayed response on the web site. Sorry for the false alarm. > Message: 6 > Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:43:43 +0200 > From: Thomas B?chler <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [arch-general] What's happening about libdjvu? > To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <4CC0276F.9050906@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" > > Am 21.10.2010 13:38, schrieb Auguste Pop: >> For instance, >> /usr/lib/evince/3/backends/libdjvudocument.so from evince package >> links to /usr/lib/libdjvulibre.so.21, which would be removed if I >> update the system to allow djvulibre to replace libdjvu. > > This is false, the djvulibre package contains this library. > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 262 bytes > Desc: OpenPGP digital signature > URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20101021/575a37a9/attachment-0001.bin> >
