On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Evangelos Foutras <foutrelis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Allan McRae <allan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Time to move on to the next rebuild! This time it is for db-5.1. >> >> There are the following soname changes: >> libdb-4.8.so -> libdb-5.1.so >> libdb-4.so -> libdb-5.so >> libdb_cxx-4.8.so -> libdb_cxx-5.1.so >> libdb_cxx-4.so -> libdb_cxx-5.so >> >> It is a relatively small rebuild of 39 packages. >> >> I never got around to the db-5.0 update but that is a good thing as many >> pieces of software check for a db major version >= 4 and minor version >= 1 >> when they just want db>=4.1... Now we have db-5.1 we do not have to fix >> that stupidness. As always, more evidence that laziness pays off. >> >> I have pushed the db update to [staging] and will work on the rest of [core] >> later tonight (unless someone beats me to it...) >> >> Allan > > What do we do for stuff like PHP which will get linked to PostgreSQL > 9.0.1 which is in [testing] right now? Or will PostgreSQL be moved out > of [testing] at the same time as the db rebuilds? There was no .so bump, so it shouldn't matter. -Dan
