Re: Python 3 Rationale?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Python 3 Rationale?
From: Max Countryman <maxc@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 07:14:43 -0400
In-reply-to: <loom.20101020T063001-954@post.gmane.org>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Oh is there another thread on this list? My apologies if so! I just joined earlier yesterday. :)

On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:31 AM, Mithrandir wrote:

> Ha ha! We posted at virtually the same time! (Or not...) :D

References:
- Setuptools broken?
  - From: Norbert Zeh
- Re: Setuptools broken?
  - From: Ray Rashif
- Python 3 Rationale?
  - From: Max Countryman
- Re: Python 3 Rationale?
  - From: Andrea Scarpino
- Re: Python 3 Rationale?
  - From: Max Countryman
- Re: Python 3 Rationale?
  - From: Allan McRae
- Re: Python 3 Rationale?
  - From: Max Countryman
- Re: Python 3 Rationale?
  - From: Mithrandir

Prev by Date: Re: no python3 package?
Next by Date: Re: no python3 package?
Previous by thread: Re: Python 3 Rationale?
Next by thread: Re: Python 3 Rationale?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux