Re: no python3 package?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 07/10/10 14:40, Angus wrote:
I'm glad Arch did the python3 transition and I agree with python3
being the default version (i.e. having 'python' symlink to
'python3.x').

But what's the reason for no longer having a package named 'python3'
with a symlink to 'python3.x'? It would make (/have made) the
transition a little easier, no? Any harm done in providing it?


I have no idea what you are talking about...

> pacman -Ss python3
testing/python 3.1.2-2 [installed]
    Next generation of the python high-level scripting language
community/python3 3.1.2-4
    Next generation of the python high-level scripting language

Note that testing/python will replace the community/python3 once it moves to [extra].

Allan



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux