Re: BTRFS, a good choice for /?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: BTRFS, a good choice for /?
From: jesse jaara <jesse.jaara@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:26:18 +0300
In-reply-to: <AANLkTi=-hcM8qmph9WMtff8GLoh8rrdSnERE=zd5=rDD@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

the archiso 2010.08 has btrfs support marked as experimental but it should
work and create a working btrfs partition, but if you want newer tolls you
can updte it or instlaa the git version

References:
- BTRFS, a good choice for /?
  - From: Nilesh Govindarajan
- Re: BTRFS, a good choice for /?
  - From: Dan Vrátil
- Re: BTRFS, a good choice for /?
  - From: Nilesh Govindarajan
- Re: BTRFS, a good choice for /?
  - From: Shridhar Daithankar
- Re: BTRFS, a good choice for /?
  - From: Nilesh Govindarajan
- Re: BTRFS, a good choice for /?
  - From: C Anthony Risinger
- Re: BTRFS, a good choice for /?
  - From: Christoph Rissner
- Re: BTRFS, a good choice for /?
  - From: Nilesh Govindarajan

Prev by Date: Re: BTRFS, a good choice for /?
Next by Date: Re: BTRFS, a good choice for /?
Previous by thread: Re: BTRFS, a good choice for /?
Next by thread: Re: BTRFS, a good choice for /?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux