Re: Any special reason for /etc/shadow.pacnew, or just normal pacman behavior.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Any special reason for /etc/shadow.pacnew, or just normal pacman behavior.
From: Daenyth Blank <daenyth+arch@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:05:38 -0400
In-reply-to: <4C990F5F.8030401@suddenlinkmail.com>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 16:02, David C. Rankin
<drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Guys,
>
>        I always diff any new .pacnew files when they are created during an update.
See "man pacman", under HANDLING CONFIG FILES. It explains the
behavior in detail.

References:
- Any special reason for /etc/shadow.pacnew, or just normal pacman behavior.
  - From: David C. Rankin

Prev by Date: Re: [signoff] kernel26 2.6.35.5-1
Next by Date: How do AUR packages get new maintainers?
Previous by thread: Any special reason for /etc/shadow.pacnew, or just normal pacman behavior.
Next by thread: Re: Any special reason for /etc/shadow.pacnew, or just normal pacman behavior.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux