On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Heiko Baums <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Like I've written on the arch-multilib mailing list I'd prefer to > having flashplugin in [multilib] renamed to lib32-flashplugin or > bin32-flashplugin and the new 64 bit version added to [extra] as > flashplugin at least if the new 64 bit version is stable and secure > enough. ++ the general consensus was to leave 64-bit flash in... when adobe cancelled it for a bit... I don't know why it ever got removed. I've had problems recently with flash and I suspect it's due to running a 32-bit version. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.com
