Rémy Oudompheng (2010-08-23 13:16): > On 2010/8/23, Jan de Groot <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 12:54 +0200, Rémy Oudompheng wrote: > >> What kind of packages are expected to be found in a multilib > >> repository? > >> Should we keep with core/extra packages, leaving 32-bit versions of > >> community packages to AUR ? In more down-to-earth terms: are we going > >> to have glibc/gtk2/firefox/flashplugin in the same place ? > > > > Firefox probably not, but a 32bit flashplugin and its dependencies are > > one of the candidates. Another thing that comes to mind is Wine, as > > there's no native 64bit port of that available. > > > > At this moment community is crowded with broken 32bit crap which is just > > i686 packages copied to a different location (in /opt... ew), where > > hardcoded configuration files still point to the old i686 locations. An > > example of this is gtk2 trying to load 64bit plugins all the time. > > Did I miss something or the 32 bit flashplugin can only be used in a > 32-bit browser ? Wouldn't it be unconvenient to have the plugin in the > repo without some widely used browser ? <...> 64bit Opera can use 32bit Flash (but the 32bit flashplugin needs a bunch of lib32-* packages from community, which have packaging problems as mentioned by Jan). -- -- Rogutės Sparnuotos
