On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:40:56 +0300, Evangelos Foutras <foutrelis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Evangelos Foutras <foutrelis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Pierre Schmitz <pierre@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Let me underline again that [staging] would be no regular repo that >>>> would be used by anyone directly. It mainly meant for collecting >>>> rebuilds. >>> >>> However, it would have to be used by anyone wanting to rebuild a >>> package against a new library that has been pushed to [staging]. >>> Therefore, it would need to be mirrored and added to /etc/pacman.conf >>> in our [testing] chroots. (By `our [testing] chroots' I mean the >>> chroots that developers and TUs have been using until now for building >>> packages for [testing].) >> >> No, it doesn't need to be mirrored. Developers have always had direct >> access to this, ask on the developer private list if you don't know >> the URL. >> >> -Dan > > Oh, neat. Can we, TUs, get access to it too? (Unless we already do and > I missed it.) ATM there wont be a need to have TUs access this repo. The main reason of excluding it from mirroring is to remove it later when we decide that this idea wasn't that great. We might think about mirroring it later though..its just the db file anyway as the packages will be kept in a pool. The only downside is that nobody should actually use that repo. (by thinking it would similar to Debians experimental) -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
