On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Dave Reisner <d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > , but of course upstream should have, imo, versioned it > as 2.14.01 to avoid this kind of nonsense. > to upstream that translates to 2.014001 which is less than 2.15 honestly what upstream should have done is made 2.1401 2.15 and now 2.15 would be 2.16 -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com
