On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Thomas Bächler <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > No no, that wouldn't make sense. It should be this way: First all > patches that actually change logic, then one big commit that just > converts the _remaining_ [ to [[ with no additional logic changes involved. > wouldn't it be better to do the other way around... first the mass conversions with no logic changes (more likely to be accepted?) then the ones with logic changes in case some get rejected. that way the mass conversion doesn't depend on logic changes by accident. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com
