On Mon 28 Jun 2010 09:13 -0500, Victor Lowther wrote: > On Jun 28, 2010, at 8:59 AM, Loui Chang <louipc.ist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >On Mon 28 Jun 2010 08:04 -0500, Dan McGee wrote: > >>On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Caleb Cushing > >><xenoterracide@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Victor Lowther > >>><victor.lowther@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>Questions, comments, flames, etc. welcome. > >>> > >>>why go this way instead of the other? (clarification why go deeper > >>>into bash instead of trying to posix-ify the scripts) > >> > >>Because we are never going to eliminate arrays from rc.conf. > > > >Well, it may still be beneficial to some. The scripts could be used > >with a different style rc.conf in other environments. > > Then it will not be Arch. Depends on what you define as Arch. I've heard that Arch is what you make of it. Hehe. I don't know if you could disqualify it from a difference of one file.
