Re: REG_RIP undeclared

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: REG_RIP undeclared
From: Lukáš Jirkovský <l.jirkovsky@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:09:18 +0200
In-reply-to: <AANLkTimPaBDEGjO1eoKXY3kpcv1v4cSQI-3v_wRrBtny@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I still see the problem. Is it possible that it's bug in GCC?

Lukas

References:
- REG_RIP undeclared
  - From: Lukáš Jirkovský
- Re: REG_RIP undeclared
  - From: Alexander 'hatred' Drozdoff
- Re: REG_RIP undeclared
  - From: Lukáš Jirkovský
- Re: REG_RIP undeclared
  - From: Lukáš Jirkovský
- Re: REG_RIP undeclared
  - From: Lukáš Jirkovský
- Re: REG_RIP undeclared
  - From: Lukáš Jirkovský
- Re: REG_RIP undeclared
  - From: Alexander 'hatred' Drozdoff
- Re: REG_RIP undeclared
  - From: Lukáš Jirkovský
- Re: REG_RIP undeclared
  - From: Lukáš Jirkovský

Prev by Date: Re: Boost
Next by Date: Re: [arch-announce] Xorg 1.8 moves to extra
Previous by thread: Re: REG_RIP undeclared
Next by thread: Re: REG_RIP undeclared
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux