I think the name should be simple (I've already commented on AST). But I wanted to point out, the name isn't everything. Its what the team does or proposes to do that should be thought about. Spending too much time on a name, while not actually doing anything is fail. -Miah On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 3:18 PM, J. McBlane <toolman33@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Arch Security Enhancement Team? > Securing Arch For Everyone? > Arch Guard? > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:46:59PM +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote: > > On to the first order of business. As the subject says, what should > > security team be called. Hopefully we can get a few suggestions and > > then reach a consensus. Arch Linux Security Task Force just sounds like > > too much of a mouthful to me. > > > > I was brooding over this and I thought some sort of acronym that's an > > actual word would sound better, so I came up with this: > > > > 'Arch Response Team for Security' or ARTS. It's a bit cheesy and > > cheats a bit to get the acronym but is instantly memorable. I'm aware > > arts was also a KDE technology but it has long since been deprecated. > > > > Ideas? > > > > Ananda > > >
