Re: Package signing for the umpteenth time (was Re: unrealircd 3.2.8.1-2 contains backdoor)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Guillaume ALAUX <guillaume@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I think that we should avoid signing files remotely.
> Is there any precise reason? If it is because "that remote place could be
> compromised" well any dev computer could be compromized too !

The main reason is that we would need to keep a copy of the private
key for each sining key in the remote machine. Of course, the private
key is encrypted with the passphrase (a good one, if possible). That
would mitigate an immediate use of a compromised private key, but with
time, it can be cracked and used to sign files on behalf the real
owner of the key. You don't want to let the card of your bank account
on two places, do you? Even though theoretically only you have the
PIN.

-- 
A: Because it obfuscates the reading.
Q: Why is top posting so bad?

-------------------------------------------
Denis A. Altoe Falqueto
-------------------------------------------


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux