Don't read websites that compare arch to debian. On Jun 3, 2010 4:40 PM, "Keith Hinton" <keithint1234@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi, Why is it that Arch seems to take longer than say other distros such as Ubuntu, Debian, etc, to support newer versions of Xorg and Gnome? I was curious about that process. While Debian/Ubuntu/etc distros seem to be supporting the Gnome desktop just fine, it appears that others most noticeably that of Gentoo and other such similar distros, mask or test out Gnome/Xorg, rather than releasing it strate away into say in Arches case, the extra/core repos. I had another question, relating to that of Arch, some webpages I have found compare Arch to Debian Cid/Unstable. How true is this, and exactly in what way is Arch Linux itself, like that of Debian Cid? Thanks! Regards, --Keith Skype: skypedude1234 MSN Messenger: keithint37@xxxxxxxxxxx Yahoo messenger /AIM: keithint1234
