On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:22 PM, dave reisner <d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Allan McRae <allan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I think gdb is fine... but I have not used it extensively. I'd >> appreciate reports from anyone who has extensively used gdb and valgrind >> with the new glibc. >> >> Allan >> > > I've been using valgrind on the new glibc. It reports a whole new slew of > warnings for previously "quiet" code, but otherwise performs as expected. > > Curl example: http://codepad.org/htorjWF9 > > dave > Followup: I'm not able to find a whole lot of hard evidence from other people about this behavior aside from a Cygwin related post [1] which I can't personally reproduce. I've opened FS#19634 with a possible resolution. [1] http://www.cygwin.com/ml/libc-alpha/2010-05/msg00024.html d
