On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Loui Chang <louipc.ist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu 27 May 2010 14:43 +0200, Xavier Chantry wrote: >> Dozens of people have contributed to the discussion, but no one >> actually cares about getting some clarifications ? >> I just don't get it. >> I feel like I did my part of the work already by getting a report from >> Eben, just to see Joerg accusing him of lying in return. >> Now it would be very nice and useful if someone could continue that >> work by getting in touch with other competent people. > > That would be nice and useful if people actually believed that there > would be an end to this discussion. Anyways, it's been stated that > licensing isn't really the issue any more. The fact is no Dev or TU is > interested in maintaining cdrtools. Jörg has something to learn a > how to deal with people, but he's too stubborn to take any advice. > > The licensing doubt might not be a show-stopper for Arch, but clearing it would still increase the chances of a dev/tu packaging it. And I was not just thinking about Arch, I was thinking about every potential packagers/distributors of cdrtools, this would be useful for all of them. So if anyone wants to become the first useful person in that discussion, (s)he knows what to do. And as a sidenote, one TU showed interest the first time : http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2010-January/010358.html I suppose he got scared away by the endless discussion.
