On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Joerg Schilling < Joerg.Schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Heiko Baums <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Why does e.g. Debian still ship libcdio? Every unbiased person should > > > have no problem to understand that what Debian did was just a slander > > > campaign against an OpenSource project. > > > > > > Jörg > > > > Jörg, why don't you just change the license of your cdrtools to a > > licensing scheme - either change every part of it to the GPL, set it > > under a dual license or whatever - which is indisputable and doubtless > > instead of arguing with the distributors all the time over years? > > > > It's really annoying to always read your nonsense regarding the > > licensing. > > The problem seems to be only that people believe the liensing nonsense FUD > spread by Debian. > > Distributors who did ask their lawyers did either never change to the > broken > and illegal cod from Debian (Sun) or do again ship cdrtools (Suse). > > I still don't understand why you ask mee to introduce a "solution" for a > non-existent problem. > > Jörg > > -- > EMail:joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<EMail%3Ajoerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>(home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin > js@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (uni) > joerg.schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (work) Blog: > http://schily.blogspot.com/ > * > * > *Korean Guide: Korean start -> Trucha bug -> Korean extra -> The basics -> > Update* > *Other Languages: Dutch* > * > * > *Latest update: April 24th 2010 -- Images have not been made by us, please > don't credit us for them!* > > URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily > How does any of this relate to the initial thread question whatsoever? Turning a simple question about burning an iso from CLI into an ongoing debate that was just on the Arch ML not a few months ago is rather annoying. I am sure I am not the only one that would like to see this debate taken elsewhere, and please let the thread die.
