On Wednesday 19 May 2010 00:25:41 Jan Steffens wrote: > I could make PulseAudio installation significantly easier by putting > specially-built packages (e.g. sdl-pulse, openal-pulse) into > [community] and grouping them in a "pulse" group. I think its a great idea to provide more "pulse" packages, so the installation of PulseAudio would be easier. However I don't think that the "pulse" group is a good idea at all, because by installing the whole group you force people to install applications they don't use (or need). "openal-pulse" and "sdl-pulse" would be great. I've had also some struggle to recompile "phonon-gstreamer" with PulseAudio support, so "phonon-gstreamer- pulse" would be another nice package to have. I guess there are plenty of packages that support PulseAudio, but haven't been compiled to do so yet. -- Best regards, Karol Babioch
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
