On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > new images are done. > version: 2010.05.13 > > these are the images I want to rename to an official 2010.05 release > after testing. > > http://build.archlinux.org/isos/Changelog > http://build.archlinux.org/isos/ > > how should they be tested? > > for every file, that is: > > archlinux-2010.05.13-core-dual.iso > archlinux-2010.05.13-core-i686.iso > archlinux-2010.05.13-core-x86_64.iso > archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-dual.iso > archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso > archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-x86_64.iso > > I want to get a report from someone that an installation went fine. > what kind of install doesn't really matter. manual, automatic, > autoprepare, net/core whatever. this has been tested enough before, so > any kind of install with each single image. > > > On top of that, I want: > A) confirmation for virtio_pci and virtio_blk on the install ISO's > initramfs http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19401?project=6 > B) at least one installation performed from a usb stick, using any of > the above images. > > > So if you test: send a reply mentioning which file you tested, and > optionally if you can confirm A/B My current system is installed from previous archlinux-2010.04.05-core-i686 image, but no idea about the release candidate image. I am using an IBM T43P. > > thanks for you help, > Dieter >
