On Sunday 09 May 2010 23:22:19 Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 09.05.2010 19:37, schrieb Thomas Bächler: > > Am 09.05.2010 19:23, schrieb Pierre Schmitz: > >> I noticed the same. But this is caused by the mkinitcpio update and not > >> the kernel. In my case "logo.nologo" in the kernel parameter line was > >> causing this. > > > > That is plan bullshit. The mkinitcpio update didn't even _touch_ the > > init file, it is entirely unchanged. > > Okay, gcc 4.5.0 still fucks up, I am pushing a new mkinitcpio-busybox > directly to core, built with -O0 this time, as this will keep breaking > people's systems. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43987 is that related? -- Regards Shridhar