On 30/04/10 09:08, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
Does anyone agree with this? If so how do I go about requesting the creation of such a list? The list would be for discussion around security in Arch, implementations and user/dev input etc. It seems like package signing has moved up the agenda now and I've also got a few things I'd like to suggest but I feel we'd be better served by a separate mailing list for security.
We have a list for the integration of package signing into pacman... or in fact, anything related to the development of pacman. And from past discussions of package signing, I expect this slowly die over the next week with no actual progress made. I
Security issues with packages should be reported to the bug tracker. Information on how to harden a system belongs in the wiki. Queries on securing your system to the forums or mailing lists (after reading the wiki, searching google etc...).
I do not see what is not already covered. Allan
