Could be I'm missing something here... But shouldn't 'pacman -S eterm' put executable somewhere in the standard path??? This was done using a root shell in a konsole terminal under E17 on my recently updated Arch installation... I did search the wiki for eterm just in case there was something about eterm that requires more than a simple pacman install. Didn't find anything useful. Am I missing something obvious here??? UnderTree =-> pacman -S eterm resolving dependencies... looking for inter-conflicts... Targets (2): libast-0.7-2 eterm-0.9.5-3 Total Download Size: 0.91 MB Total Installed Size: 2.98 MB Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y :: Retrieving packages from community... libast-0.7-2 260.8K 315.2K/s 00:00:01 [###############################] 100% eterm-0.9.5-3 674.3K 828.9K/s 00:00:01 [###############################] 100% checking package integrity... (2/2) checking for file conflicts [###############################] 100% (1/2) installing libast [###############################] 100% (2/2) installing eterm [###############################] 100% UnderTree =-> eterm bash: eterm: command not found UnderTree =-> Here are the last few lines of my pacman.log: [2010-04-17 00:35] synchronizing package lists [2010-04-17 00:38] installed roxterm (1.18.1-1) [2010-04-19 21:31] synchronizing package lists [2010-04-19 21:34] installed libast (0.7-2) [2010-04-19 21:34] installed eterm (0.9.5-3) I note roxterm works, eterm doesn't... I don't see any errors listed in the pacman.log... -- | ~^~ ~^~ | <?> <?> Joe (theWordy) Philbrook | ^ J(tWdy)P | \___/ <<jtwdyp@xxxxxxxx>>
