On 07.04.2010 16:10, Allan McRae wrote: > This would really not help here. Pacman does not directly link openssl, > but does through libarchive and libfetch. Adding versioned libarchive > and libfetch to pacman's deps and using sodeps on openssl in those > packages would prevent pacman's SyncFirst from working. > Don't add depends=(libfetch.sp libarchive.so) to the pacman PKGBUILD and it won't be a problem. (Also see #2 below) > no versioned deps in pacman for lib{archive,fetch} = bad as between the > openssl and lib{archive,fetch} updates vercmp is broken and so is > install files. sodeps would ensure that pacman updates libfetch and libarchive directly after openssl. > >> Have you already checked the patch Allan? > > Yes... but my comments were never addressed: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2010-February/010446.html Which patch version did you read back then? The one you replied to has all but 1 of those changes. (See below) > http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2010-February/010406.html > (points #1 and #2) 1) I'm only waiting for someone to implement the change in pacman (I'm not good at C), but the makepkg part is already done. 2) The latest patch does exactly that. > http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2010-February/010421.html I've removed that already. > http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2010-February/010426.html I actually don't worry about it anymore and the current code works so I see no need to change it. -- Florian Pritz -- {flo,bluewind}@server-speed.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature