Re: The libgmp update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 09:21:51 +1000
Allan McRae <allan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 28/03/10 08:19, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 27. März 2010 23:08:08 schrieb Hilton Medeiros:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> just to confirm, all the packages linked against the new libgmp
> >> should follow 'coreutils' example and use 'gmp>=5.0', right?
> >> I just saw that gnunet didn't.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Hilton
> >
> > No, it's the other way round. Using versioned deps is just wrong.
> >
> 
> Agreed.  Not having it means you can not do "pacman -Sy gnunet" which 
> would update gmp as a side effect if using a versed dep and cause
> havok to the rest of your system.  Not having it means only gnunet
> would be affected.

Understood. This just saved me... well thought, thanks.

Cheers


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux