Re: gsfonts - package is updated?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 26/03/2010 11:18, Xavier Chantry wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Firmicus<Firmicus@xxxxxxx>  wrote:
PS: Yes, the stupid version numbers for those fonts used upstream by the
ghostscript project is also part of the mess I was referring to, but far
worse it the fact that the fonts have not been released as a standalone
tarball for so long. The fonts themselves (outlines and metrics) are of a
  very high quality, so there is no problem in that respect. It's just that
the ghostscript project does not seem to care releasing them. The tarball
was generated by Fedora from the ghostscript svn repo. The new version not
only fixes the bug mentioned above, but also adds glyphs for Cyrillic.

Did you try to communicate with upstream ? It is not always bound to failures :)
It just takes a few minutes to write a mail. And sometimes there are results !


Done
http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=687297#c31


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux