On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 00:31 +0100, Xavier Chantry wrote: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Giovanni Scafora > <giovanni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Il 26/03/2010 00:02, Ng Oon-Ee ha scritto: > >> > >> Repository : extra > >> Name : gsfonts > >> Version : 1.0.7pre44-1 > >> Installed : 8.11-5 > >> URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gs-fonts/ > >> > >> I'm assuming this is a simple mess upstream on non-consecutive version > >> numbers? The linked sourceforge page still lists 8.11 as the stable > >> version, while the one currently in extra is listed as 'pre' (and > >> doesn't seem available in the sourceforge page? > >> > > > > I guess that maintainer forgotten the force option. > > svn log message says "Use newer version of the fonts as provided by Fedora's > > package urw-fonts Fixes FS#10593" > > > > > > It's indeed all well explained in the two comments of that bug : > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10593#comment59554 Oh! I thought the bug number was Fedora's bug tracker.... my bad. Explains very well.
